http://inel.wordpress.com/2008/02/11/apocalypse-no-just-a-cover-story/ Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:09:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU http://inel.wordpress.com/2008/02/11/apocalypse-no-just-a-cover-story/#comment-25065 jeanine patterson Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:41:52 +0000 http://inel.wordpress.com/?p=2396#comment-25065 Can you tell me where I can get the DVD Apocalypse NO ? I can seem to find where I can get it sent to me in Canada Can you tell me where I can get the DVD Apocalypse NO ? I can seem to find where I can get it sent to me in Canada

]]> http://inel.wordpress.com/2008/02/11/apocalypse-no-just-a-cover-story/#comment-24697 David Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:22:17 +0000 http://inel.wordpress.com/?p=2396#comment-24697 Abusing his title? It does give him a forum I suppose, a bit liking being the ex-VP of the USA. Monckton's academic credentials are a lot better than Al Gore's (a C minus student in his science classes). More importantly, both Gore and Monckton claim to base their arguments on the peer reviewed work of credible scientists (rather than their own work). That is definitely true for Monckton (he references all his sources), it may even be true for Gore - the very least conlusion a rational person would have to take from Monckton's video and writings is that the issue of global warming is capable of huge differences of interpretation depending on what scientific reports you subjectively select. Scientific consensus? That is one 'fact' in Gore's version that is unquestionably wrong. Abusing his title? It does give him a forum I suppose, a bit liking being the ex-VP of the USA. Monckton’s academic credentials are a lot better than Al Gore’s (a C minus student in his science classes). More importantly, both Gore and Monckton claim to base their arguments on the peer reviewed work of credible scientists (rather than their own work). That is definitely true for Monckton (he references all his sources), it may even be true for Gore - the very least conlusion a rational person would have to take from Monckton’s video and writings is that the issue of global warming is capable of huge differences of interpretation depending on what scientific reports you subjectively select. Scientific consensus? That is one ‘fact’ in Gore’s version that is unquestionably wrong.

]]> http://inel.wordpress.com/2008/02/11/apocalypse-no-just-a-cover-story/#comment-24673 Hekai Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:56:38 +0000 http://inel.wordpress.com/?p=2396#comment-24673 Oh, now <em>that's</em> a scare story! Is he even <em>supposed</em> to know what he's talking about, or is he just abusing his title? Oh, now that’s a scare story! Is he even supposed to know what he’s talking about, or is he just abusing his title?

]]>