BA reprimanded over claim that new runway will reduce CO2 emissions

January 15, 2008 at 7:24 am | Posted in Advertising Standards Authority, ASA, Aviation, BA, British Airways, Climate change, CO2 emissions, Deception, GHG emissions, Heathrow, Heathrow expansion | Leave a comment

Dear neighbours,

Local newspaper examples will follow.  Meanwhile, this article from a national newspaper indicates what we’re up against in dealing with British Airways’ Chief Executive as he campaigns for a third runway at Heathrow:

From The Times
January 5, 2008
BA reprimanded over claim that new runway will reduce emissions
Ben Webster, Transport Correspondent

British Airways has been reprimanded for attempting to manipulate a government consultation on the expansion of Heathrow by making false claims about the environmental impact.

The Advertising Standards Authority has written to BA ordering it to withdraw a claim, in an e-mail to customers by Willie Walsh, the chief executive, that a new runway would reduce carbon dioxide emissions.

Mr Walsh wrote to tens of thousands of members of the airline’s Executive Club in November asking them to support the construction of a third runway. He sent the e-mail the day after the Government announced a three-month public consultation on expanding Heathrow. Mr Walsh claimed that expansion would reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 330,000 tonnes a year because aircraft would no longer have to waste fuel queueing for take-off or circling while waiting to land.

His e-mail implied that the claim about CO2 reduction had been endorsed by the Government. But he failed to make clear that, according to the Department for Transport’s consultation document, the new runway would raise overall CO2 emissions by 2.6 million tonnes a year by allowing an extra 220,000 flights.

The authority has asked BA to confirm by January 9 that it will not repeat the claim. In a letter to a BA customer who complained about the e-mail, the authority wrote: “We believe you have a valid point and have instructed BA to change their ad. We have asked them for a written assurance that any future marketing communications about the expansion of Heathrow airport will not suggest an overall decrease in CO2 emissions.”

BA refused to say last night whether it would comply with the authority’s letter. It also refused to say how many passengers had been sent the e-mail or whether the airline would now send them a clarification. In a statement, the airline said:“By the time a third runway opened, emissions trading — for which British Airways has long campaigned — would ensure that every extra tonne of carbon dioxide from aviation growth above 2005 levels would be matched by a tonne saved elsewhere.”

P.S.  The false claim that carbon dioxide emissions would be reduced by adding capacity in the form of a third runway, because aircraft would waste less fuel circling in the four stacks around Heathrow airport waiting for landing, is still alive and kicking.  It was used by two of the expert consultants I met yesterday at the public consultation in Colnbrook when I mentioned my concerns about climate change.


Leave a Comment »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at
Entries and comments feeds.

%d bloggers like this: